Who is better, b1t or Keria?
Valeriy "b1t" Vakhovskiy leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.4 for Ryu "Keria" Min-seok — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Valeriy "b1t" Vakhovskiy and Ryu "Keria" Min-seok level at 86.4. Valeriy "b1t" Vakhovskiy leads on Statistics, Longevity. Ryu "Keria" Min-seok leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →b1t wins: Longevity, Statistics
Keria wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-b1t-vs-keria-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
b1t leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇦 b1t | 0 | 0 | 60 | 138 | 417 | 672 |
| 🇰🇷 Keria | 0 | 0 | 74 | 158 | 428 | 612 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | b1tActive | KeriaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | 1 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 3 | — |
| Big tournament titles | 9 | — |
| Seasons played | 7 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| LCK titles | — | 2 |
| World finals | — | 4 |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | — | 1 |
| Professional seasons | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Valeriy "b1t" Vakhovskiy leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.4 for Ryu "Keria" Min-seok — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Keria scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. b1t leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. b1t: 86.4, Keria: 86.4.
Make your case for b1t vs Keria. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.