Who is better, Bin or Rekkles?
Chen "Bin" Zebin leads with a GOAT score of 87.1 against 87.0 for Martin "Rekkles" Larsson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chen "Bin" Zebin above Martin "Rekkles" Larsson: 87.1 vs 87.0. Chen "Bin" Zebin leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Martin "Rekkles" Larsson leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bin wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Rekkles wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/es-bin-vs-rekkles-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bin leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Bin | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 359 | 729 |
| 🇸🇪 Rekkles | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 294 | 740 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BinActive | RekklesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| World Championship finals | 3 | — |
| LPL titles | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 8 | — |
| Finals MVP awards | 1 | — |
| LEC titles | — | 6 |
| World finals | — | 1 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 7 |
| LEC MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Professional seasons | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Chen "Bin" Zebin leads with a GOAT score of 87.1 against 87.0 for Martin "Rekkles" Larsson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rekkles scores higher on longevity. Bin leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bin: 87.1, Rekkles: 87.0.
Make your case for Bin vs Rekkles. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.