Who is better, blameF or zai?
Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.6 for Benjamin "blameF" Bremer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg above Benjamin "blameF" Bremer: 87.7 vs 87.6. Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg leads on Longevity, Honours. Benjamin "blameF" Bremer leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →zai wins: Longevity, Honours
blameF wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-blamef-vs-es-zai
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
zai leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 blameF | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 282 | 735 |
| 🇸🇪 zai | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 690 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | blameFActive | zaiActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 7 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 5 | — |
| Tournament MVP awards | 4 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | 12 |
| Career rating above 1.15 seasons | 4 | — |
| Major titles | — | 5 |
| The International top-four finishes | — | 3 |
| Career prize money in millions | — | 3 |
| The International appearances | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 90 |
Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.6 for Benjamin "blameF" Bremer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
blameF scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. zai leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. blameF: 87.6, zai: 87.7.
Make your case for blameF vs zai. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.