blameF vs Faker
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Faker wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours
blameF wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-blamef-vs-faker
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Faker leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Five World Championships across twelve competitive years.
Category breakdown
Season form · Trophies per season
Career timeline · Trophies per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for blameF — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | blameFActive | FakerActive · T1 (SK Telecom T1) |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 7 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 5 | — |
| Tournament MVP awards | 4 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Career rating above 1.15 seasons | 4 | — |
| World Championships | — | 5 |
| MSI titles | — | 2 |
| Domestic league titles | — | 10 |
| Career KDA | — | 5.1 |
| Pro seasons | — | 12 |
| Career prize money (M$) | — | 1.6 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 98 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 97 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 99 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 99 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 93 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for blameF vs Faker. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.