Who is better, blameF or MinD_ContRoL?
Benjamin "blameF" Bremer leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for MinD_ContRoL — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Benjamin "blameF" Bremer and MinD_ContRoL level at 87.6. Benjamin "blameF" Bremer leads on Statistics, Peak. MinD_ContRoL leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →blameF wins: Peak, Statistics
MinD_ContRoL wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-blamef-vs-mind-control-d2
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
blameF leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 blameF | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 282 | 735 |
| 🇧🇬 MinD_ContRoL | 0 | 0 | 58 | 125 | 383 | 726 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | blameFActive | MinD_ContRoLActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 7 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 5 | — |
| Tournament MVP awards | 4 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Career rating above 1.15 seasons | 4 | — |
| The International titles | — | 1 |
| The International finals | — | 2 |
| Major titles | — | 4 |
| TI appearances | — | 7 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 86 |
Benjamin "blameF" Bremer leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for MinD_ContRoL — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
MinD_ContRoL scores higher on honours. blameF leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. blameF: 87.6, MinD_ContRoL: 87.6.
Make your case for blameF vs MinD_ContRoL. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.