Who is better, Boombl4 or YEKINDAR?
Kirill "Boombl4" Mikhailov leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kirill "Boombl4" Mikhailov above Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis: 86.6 vs 86.5. Kirill "Boombl4" Mikhailov leads on Honours. Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis leads on Statistics, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Boombl4 wins: Honours
YEKINDAR wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-boombl4-vs-es-yekindar
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Boombl4 leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Boombl4 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 327 | 688 |
| 🇱🇻 YEKINDAR | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 268 | 717 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Boombl4Active | YEKINDARActive |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | 1 | — |
| Big tournament titles | 12 | 8 |
| Seasons played | 11 | 10 |
| Major finals | 1 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 3 |
| Major playoff appearances | — | 5 |
| Opening kills per round leader seasons | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Kirill "Boombl4" Mikhailov leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
YEKINDAR scores higher on dominance, statistics, longevity. Boombl4 leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Boombl4: 86.6, YEKINDAR: 86.5.
Make your case for Boombl4 vs YEKINDAR. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.