Who is better, Boombl4 or NiKo?
Kirill "Boombl4" Mikhailov leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.4 for Nikola "NiKo" Kovač — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kirill "Boombl4" Mikhailov above Nikola "NiKo" Kovač: 86.6 vs 86.4. Kirill "Boombl4" Mikhailov leads on Honours. Nikola "NiKo" Kovač leads on Longevity, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Boombl4 wins: Honours
NiKo wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-boombl4-vs-niko
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Boombl4 leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Boombl4 — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | Boombl4Active | NiKoActive · FaZe Clan |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | 1 | — |
| Big tournament titles | 12 | — |
| Seasons played | 11 | — |
| Major finals | 1 | — |
| Major titles | — | 0 |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 9 |
| Big event finals | — | 22 |
| Career rating 2.0 | — | 1.17 |
| Big event MVPs | — | 10 |
| Career prize money (M$) | — | 1.6 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 94 |
Kirill "Boombl4" Mikhailov leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.4 for Nikola "NiKo" Kovač — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
NiKo scores higher on dominance, statistics, longevity. Boombl4 leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Boombl4: 86.6, NiKo: 86.4.
Make your case for Boombl4 vs NiKo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.