Who is better, Diamondprox or sh1ro?
Dmitry "sh1ro" Sokolov leads with a GOAT score of 88.5 against 87.5 for Danil "Diamondprox" Reshetnikov — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dmitry "sh1ro" Sokolov above Danil "Diamondprox" Reshetnikov: 88.5 vs 87.5. Dmitry "sh1ro" Sokolov leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Danil "Diamondprox" Reshetnikov leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →sh1ro wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Diamondprox wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/es-diamondprox-vs-es-sh1ro
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
sh1ro leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Diamondprox | 0 | 0 | 60 | 139 | 408 | 662 |
| 🇷🇺 sh1ro | 0 | 0 | 55 | 124 | 400 | 742 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DiamondproxRetired | sh1roActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship finals | 1 | — |
| International titles | 2 | — |
| Regional titles | 6 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | 8 |
| All-star appearances | 2 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Big tournament titles | — | 12 |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 4 |
| Best yearly rating | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 94 |
Dmitry "sh1ro" Sokolov leads with a GOAT score of 88.5 against 87.5 for Danil "Diamondprox" Reshetnikov — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Diamondprox scores higher on longevity. sh1ro leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Diamondprox: 87.5, sh1ro: 88.5.
Make your case for Diamondprox vs sh1ro. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.