AthletesTeams
EliGE vs Fear
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
EliGEWinner
90.9EliGE wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Fear
89.0Fear wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to EsportsShareable URL · /compare/es-elige-vs-es-fear
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski
90.9
EliGE leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski
2. Clinton "Fear" Loomis
Category breakdown
Season form · Trophies per season
Career timeline · Trophies per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Trophies per season1. 🇺🇸 Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski5 split years played · career day 1,825329 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Clinton "Fear" Loomis5 split years played · career day 1,825300 trophies
-8.8% vs EliGE at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 EliGE | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 329 | 700 |
| 🇺🇸 Fear | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 634 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EliGEActive | FearRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | 1 | — |
| Big tournament titles | 24 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 6 | — |
| Seasons played | 13 | 15 |
| The International titles | — | 1 |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| The International appearances | — | 6 |
| Career prize money in millions | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 88 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
EliGE90.9
Fear89.0
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for EliGE vs Fear. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.