Who is better, EliGE or missharvey?
Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski leads with a GOAT score of 90.9 against 90.4 for Stephanie "missharvey" Harvey — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski above Stephanie "missharvey" Harvey: 90.9 vs 90.4. Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski leads on Statistics, Peak. Stephanie "missharvey" Harvey leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →EliGE wins: Peak, Statistics
missharvey wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/es-elige-vs-es-stephanie-harvey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
EliGE leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 EliGE | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 329 | 700 |
| 🇨🇦 missharvey | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 308 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EliGEActive | missharveyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | 1 | — |
| Big tournament titles | 24 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 6 | — |
| Seasons played | 13 | 18 |
| Women's world championships | — | 5 |
| International tournaments played | — | 80 |
| Teams captained | — | 3 |
| Hall of fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 88 |
Jonathan "EliGE" Jablonowski leads with a GOAT score of 90.9 against 90.4 for Stephanie "missharvey" Harvey — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
missharvey scores higher on longevity. EliGE leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. EliGE: 90.9, missharvey: 90.4.
Make your case for EliGE vs missharvey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.