Who is better, faveN or NertZ?
Guy "NertZ" Iluz leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.9 for Josef "faveN" Baumann — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
faveN vs NertZ
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Guy "NertZ" Iluz above Josef "faveN" Baumann: 79.0 vs 78.9. Guy "NertZ" Iluz leads on Dominance. Josef "faveN" Baumann leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
NertZWinner
79.0NertZ wins: Dominance
faveN
78.9faveN wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to EsportsShareable URL · /compare/es-faven-vs-es-nertz
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇱 Guy "NertZ" Iluz
79.0
NertZ leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Guy "NertZ" Iluz
2. Josef "faveN" Baumann
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇩🇪 Josef "faveN" Baumann5 split years played · career day 1,826330 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇱 Guy "NertZ" Iluz5 split years played · career day 1,825330 trophies
0.0% vs faveN at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 faveN | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 248 | 676 |
| 🇮🇱 NertZ | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 670 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
NertZ79.0
faveN78.9
FAQ
Where does faveN beat NertZ?
faveN scores higher on longevity. NertZ leads on dominance.
How is the faveN vs NertZ score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. faveN: 78.9, NertZ: 79.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for faveN vs NertZ. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.