Who is better, faveN or Miracle-?
Josef "faveN" Baumann leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.6 for Amer "Miracle-" Al-Barkawi — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Josef "faveN" Baumann above Amer "Miracle-" Al-Barkawi: 78.9 vs 78.6. Josef "faveN" Baumann leads on Statistics, Longevity. Amer "Miracle-" Al-Barkawi leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →faveN wins: Longevity, Statistics
Miracle- wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-faven-vs-miracle
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
faveN leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 faveN | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 248 | 676 |
| 🇯🇴 Miracle- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 38 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | faveNActive | Miracle-Active |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 4 | — |
| Major appearances | 6 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Career maps played | 1,500 | — |
| Tournament finals | 7 | — |
| The International titles | — | 1 |
| Major titles | — | 4 |
| Career prize money (USD) | — | 5,000,000 |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 15 |
| MVP awards | — | 4 |
| Years at tier-1 level | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 80 |
Josef "faveN" Baumann leads with a GOAT score of 78.9 against 78.6 for Amer "Miracle-" Al-Barkawi — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Miracle- scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. faveN leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. faveN: 78.9, Miracle-: 78.6.
Make your case for faveN vs Miracle-. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.