Who is better, Fear or ShowMaker?
Clinton "Fear" Loomis leads with a GOAT score of 89.0 against 88.8 for ShowMaker — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Clinton "Fear" Loomis above ShowMaker: 89.0 vs 88.8. Clinton "Fear" Loomis leads on Longevity. ShowMaker leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fear wins: Longevity
ShowMaker wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-fear-vs-showmaker-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fear leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Fear | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 634 |
| 🇰🇷 ShowMaker | 0 | 0 | 62 | 141 | 422 | 764 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FearRetired | ShowMakerActive |
|---|---|---|
| The International titles | 1 | — |
| Major titles | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 15 | — |
| The International appearances | 6 | — |
| Career prize money in millions | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| LCK titles | — | 4 |
| Worlds MVP-level finals | — | 1 |
| Worlds appearances | — | 6 |
| All-Pro selections | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Clinton "Fear" Loomis leads with a GOAT score of 89.0 against 88.8 for ShowMaker — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
ShowMaker scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Fear leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fear: 89.0, ShowMaker: 88.8.
Make your case for Fear vs ShowMaker. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.