Who is better, floppy or Topson?
Ricky "floppy" Kemery leads with a GOAT score of 79.8 against 79.7 for Topson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ricky "floppy" Kemery above Topson: 79.8 vs 79.7. Ricky "floppy" Kemery leads on Longevity, Statistics. Topson leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →floppy wins: Longevity, Statistics
Topson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-floppy-vs-topson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
floppy leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 floppy | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 332 | 674 |
| 🇫🇮 Topson | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | floppyActive | TopsonActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 3 | — |
| Major appearances | 6 | — |
| Seasons played | 8 | — |
| Career maps played | 1,300 | — |
| Tournament finals | 5 | — |
| The International titles | — | 2 |
| Career prize money (USD) | — | 6,300,000 |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 5 |
| TI appearances | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 80 |
Ricky "floppy" Kemery leads with a GOAT score of 79.8 against 79.7 for Topson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Topson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. floppy leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. floppy: 79.8, Topson: 79.7.
Make your case for floppy vs Topson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.