Who is better, jabbi or TACO?
Epitacio "TACO" de Melo leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.6 for Jakob "jabbi" Nygaard — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Epitacio "TACO" de Melo above Jakob "jabbi" Nygaard: 81.8 vs 81.6. Epitacio "TACO" de Melo leads on Longevity, Honours. Jakob "jabbi" Nygaard leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →TACO wins: Longevity, Honours
jabbi wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-jabbi-vs-taco-cs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
TACO leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 jabbi | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 338 | 607 |
| 🇧🇷 TACO | 0 | 0 | 58 | 130 | 398 | 686 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | jabbiActive | TACOActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 7 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 1 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 7 | — |
| Tournament finals | 9 | — |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| Major finals | — | 2 |
| Big event titles | — | 10 |
| Major appearances | — | 12 |
| Professional seasons | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 80 |
Epitacio "TACO" de Melo leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.6 for Jakob "jabbi" Nygaard — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
jabbi scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. TACO leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. jabbi: 81.6, TACO: 81.8.
Make your case for jabbi vs TACO. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.