GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

kioShiMa vs Magisk

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
kioShiMaWinner
84.4

kioShiMa wins: Longevity, Statistics

Magisk
84.2

Magisk wins: Dominance

Candidates
Locked to Esports

Shareable URL · /compare/es-kioshima-vs-magisk

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇫🇷 Fabien "kioShiMa" Fiey
84.4

kioShiMa leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Major champion with Team EnVyUs at DreamHack Cluj-Napoca 2015.

1. Fabien "kioShiMa" Fiey
84.4
2. Magisk
84.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Trophies per season

Career timeline · Trophies per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through split year 5 · Trophies per season
1. 🇩🇰 Magisk5 split years played · career day 1,825410 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇷 Fabien "kioShiMa" Fiey5 split years played · career day 1,826363 trophies
-11.5% vs Magisk at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇫🇷 kioShiMa0050111268643
🇩🇰 Magisk0062140410730

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetrickioShiMaRetiredMagiskActive
Majors won12
Big tournament titles7
Major finals2
Seasons played10
Tournament finals12
Intel Grand Slam titles2
HLTV top-20 appearances6
Big event titles18
Big event MVP awards4
Dominance w25%8082
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8280
Honours w20%8484
Statistics w15%8886

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
kioShiMa84.4
Magisk84.2
The people
kioShiMa
Magisk

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for kioShiMa vs Magisk. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →