Who is better, NAF or missharvey?
Stephanie "missharvey" Harvey leads with a GOAT score of 90.4 against 89.6 for Keith "NAF" Markovic — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Stephanie "missharvey" Harvey above Keith "NAF" Markovic: 90.4 vs 89.6. Stephanie "missharvey" Harvey leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours. Keith "NAF" Markovic leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →missharvey wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
NAF wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-naf-vs-es-stephanie-harvey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
missharvey leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 NAF | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 327 | 694 |
| 🇨🇦 missharvey | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 308 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NAFActive | missharveyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | 1 | — |
| Big tournament titles | 22 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 12 | 18 |
| Women's world championships | — | 5 |
| International tournaments played | — | 80 |
| Teams captained | — | 3 |
| Hall of fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 88 |
Stephanie "missharvey" Harvey leads with a GOAT score of 90.4 against 89.6 for Keith "NAF" Markovic — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
NAF scores higher on statistics. missharvey leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. NAF: 89.6, missharvey: 90.4.
Make your case for NAF vs missharvey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.