Who is better, seized or Nisha?
Michał "Nisha" Jankowski leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.7 for Denis "seized" Kostin — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Michał "Nisha" Jankowski above Denis "seized" Kostin: 83.0 vs 82.7. Michał "Nisha" Jankowski leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Denis "seized" Kostin leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nisha wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
seized wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-seized-vs-nisha-dota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nisha leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 seized | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 264 | 630 |
| 🇵🇱 Nisha | 0 | 0 | 66 | 144 | 328 | 738 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | seizedRetired | NishaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 8 | — |
| Major finals | 2 | 7 |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 1 | — |
| Career maps played | 1,500 | — |
| Major titles | — | 4 |
| The International appearances | — | 6 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 2.5 |
| Professional seasons | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Michał "Nisha" Jankowski leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.7 for Denis "seized" Kostin — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
seized scores higher on statistics, longevity. Nisha leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. seized: 82.7, Nisha: 83.0.
Make your case for seized vs Nisha. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.