Who is better, ShahZaM or flusha?
Shahzeeb "ShahZaM" Khan leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.5 for flusha — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Shahzeeb "ShahZaM" Khan and flusha level at 84.5. Shahzeeb "ShahZaM" Khan leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. flusha leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →ShahZaM wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
flusha wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-shahzam-vs-flusha
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
ShahZaM leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 ShahZaM | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 230 | 630 |
| 🇸🇪 flusha | 0 | 0 | 52 | 120 | 298 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ShahZaMActive | flushaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Valorant international titles | 1 | — |
| Valorant Champions Tour finals | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 14 | — |
| Teams captained | 3 | — |
| Major appearances | 3 | — |
| Majors won | — | 3 |
| Major MVP awards | — | 1 |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 4 |
| Big event titles | — | 20 |
| Major finals reached | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Shahzeeb "ShahZaM" Khan leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.5 for flusha — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
flusha scores higher on dominance, honours. ShahZaM leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. ShahZaM: 84.5, flusha: 84.5.
Make your case for ShahZaM vs flusha. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.