Who is better, shroud or xPeke?
Michael "shroud" Grzesiek leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Enrique "xPeke" Cedeño Martínez — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Michael "shroud" Grzesiek and Enrique "xPeke" Cedeño Martínez level at 81.1. Michael "shroud" Grzesiek leads on Statistics. Enrique "xPeke" Cedeño Martínez leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →shroud wins: Statistics
xPeke wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-shroud-vs-xpeke-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
shroud leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 shroud | 0 | 0 | 50 | 114 | 358 | 408 |
| 🇪🇸 xPeke | 0 | 0 | 96 | 180 | 424 | 546 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | shroudRetired | xPekeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 4 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 3 | — |
| Seasons played | 6 | — |
| Tournament finals | 7 | — |
| Career maps played | 900 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 4 |
| European finals | — | 5 |
| Professional seasons | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 80 |
Michael "shroud" Grzesiek leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 81.1 for Enrique "xPeke" Cedeño Martínez — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
xPeke scores higher on honours. shroud leads on statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. shroud: 81.1, xPeke: 81.1.
Make your case for shroud vs xPeke. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.