Who is better, Skadoodle or fer?
Fernando "fer" Alvarenga leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.3 for Tyler "Skadoodle" Latham — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Fernando "fer" Alvarenga above Tyler "Skadoodle" Latham: 85.4 vs 85.3. Fernando "fer" Alvarenga leads on Longevity. Tyler "Skadoodle" Latham leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →fer wins: Longevity
Skadoodle wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-skadoodle-vs-fer-cs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
fer leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Skadoodle | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 368 | 555 |
| 🇧🇷 fer | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 400 | 712 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SkadoodleRetired | ferActive |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Major MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Big tournament titles | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 8 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 3 | — |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| Major finals | — | 2 |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 4 |
| Big event titles | — | 12 |
| Professional seasons | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Fernando "fer" Alvarenga leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.3 for Tyler "Skadoodle" Latham — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Skadoodle scores higher on peak, honours, statistics. fer leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Skadoodle: 85.3, fer: 85.4.
Make your case for Skadoodle vs fer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.