Who is better, SmithZz or XinQ?
Edouard "SmithZz" Dubourdeaux leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for XinQ — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Edouard "SmithZz" Dubourdeaux and XinQ level at 81.2. Edouard "SmithZz" Dubourdeaux leads on Longevity, Statistics. XinQ leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →SmithZz wins: Longevity, Statistics
XinQ wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-smithzz-vs-xinq-d2
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
SmithZz leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 SmithZz | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 320 | 662 |
| 🇨🇳 XinQ | 0 | 0 | 55 | 122 | 380 | 696 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SmithZzRetired | XinQActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 8 | — |
| Seasons played | 15 | — |
| Major appearances | 5 | — |
| Career maps played | 1,500 | — |
| Tournament finals | 12 | — |
| TI finals | — | 1 |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| TI appearances | — | 4 |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 4 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 87 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Edouard "SmithZz" Dubourdeaux leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for XinQ — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
XinQ scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. SmithZz leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. SmithZz: 81.2, XinQ: 81.2.
Make your case for SmithZz vs XinQ. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.