Who is better, Staehr or HooXi?
Rasmus "HooXi" Nielsen leads with a GOAT score of 78.3 against 78.1 for Jens "Staehr" Staehr — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Rasmus "HooXi" Nielsen above Jens "Staehr" Staehr: 78.3 vs 78.1. Rasmus "HooXi" Nielsen leads on Longevity, Honours. Jens "Staehr" Staehr leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →HooXi wins: Longevity, Honours
Staehr wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-staehr-vs-hooxi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
HooXi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Staehr | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 350 | 680 |
| 🇩🇰 HooXi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 6.67 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | StaehrActive | HooXiActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 3 | — |
| Major appearances | 4 | — |
| Seasons played | 8 | — |
| Career maps played | 1,200 | — |
| Tournament finals | 5 | — |
| Big events won | — | 5 |
| Major playoff appearances | — | 2 |
| Seasons as in-game leader | — | 8 |
| Career rating | — | 0.95 |
| Tier-one teams captained | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
Rasmus "HooXi" Nielsen leads with a GOAT score of 78.3 against 78.1 for Jens "Staehr" Staehr — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Staehr scores higher on dominance, statistics. HooXi leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Staehr: 78.1, HooXi: 78.3.
Make your case for Staehr vs HooXi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.