Who is better, Staehr or xertioN?
Jens "Staehr" Staehr leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 77.8 for Dorian "xertioN" Berman — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jens "Staehr" Staehr above Dorian "xertioN" Berman: 78.1 vs 77.8. Jens "Staehr" Staehr leads on Longevity. Dorian "xertioN" Berman leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Staehr wins: Longevity
xertioN wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-staehr-vs-xertion
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Staehr leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Staehr | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 350 | 680 |
| 🇮🇱 xertioN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.07 | 4.38 | 4.38 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | StaehrActive | xertioNActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 3 | — |
| Major appearances | 4 | — |
| Seasons played | 8 | — |
| Career maps played | 1,200 | — |
| Tournament finals | 5 | — |
| Big events won | — | 4 |
| Top-20 player rankings | — | 1 |
| Major playoff appearances | — | 2 |
| Career rating | — | 1.1 |
| MVP medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Jens "Staehr" Staehr leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 77.8 for Dorian "xertioN" Berman — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
xertioN scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Staehr leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Staehr: 78.1, xertioN: 77.8.
Make your case for Staehr vs xertioN. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.