Who is better, summit1g or shox?
Jaryd "summit1g" Lazar leads with a GOAT score of 73.8 against 67.8 for shox — a gap of 6.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jaryd "summit1g" Lazar above shox: 73.8 vs 67.8. Jaryd "summit1g" Lazar leads on Statistics, Dominance, Honours. shox leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →summit1g wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
shox wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/es-summit1g-vs-shox
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
summit1g leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 summit1g | 0 | 0 | 50 | 112 | 338 | 383 |
| 🇫🇷 shox | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.08 | 4.51 | 8.81 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | summit1gRetired | shoxActive |
|---|---|---|
| Seasons played | 6 | — |
| National tournament titles | 2 | — |
| Career maps played | 500 | — |
| Tournament finals | 4 | — |
| Major qualifier appearances | 2 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Major MVP awards | — | 1 |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 6 |
| Career prize money (USD) | — | 1,000,000 |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 62 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 66 | 60 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 66 |
Jaryd "summit1g" Lazar leads with a GOAT score of 73.8 against 67.8 for shox — a gap of 6.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
shox scores higher on longevity. summit1g leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. summit1g: 73.8, shox: 67.8.
Make your case for summit1g vs shox. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.