Who is better, valde or Tarzan?
Valdemar "valde" Bjørn Vangså leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Tarzan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Valdemar "valde" Bjørn Vangså and Tarzan level at 82.2. Valdemar "valde" Bjørn Vangså leads on Statistics, Peak. Tarzan leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →valde wins: Peak, Statistics
Tarzan wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-valde-vs-tarzan-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
valde leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 valde | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 386 | 718 |
| 🇰🇷 Tarzan | 0 | 0 | 55 | 122 | 380 | 705 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | valdeActive | TarzanActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 4 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 2 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Tournament MVP awards | 1 | — |
| LCK MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Worlds appearances | — | 3 |
| All-Pro first team selections | — | 2 |
| LPL playoff runs | — | 3 |
| Career playoff series | — | 40 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Valdemar "valde" Bjørn Vangså leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Tarzan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Tarzan scores higher on dominance, honours. valde leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. valde: 82.2, Tarzan: 82.2.
Make your case for valde vs Tarzan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.