Who is better, w0nderful or Oner?
Mun "Oner" Hyeon-jun leads with a GOAT score of 84.3 against 83.7 for Ihor "w0nderful" Zhdanov — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mun "Oner" Hyeon-jun above Ihor "w0nderful" Zhdanov: 84.3 vs 83.7. Mun "Oner" Hyeon-jun leads on Longevity, Honours. Ihor "w0nderful" Zhdanov leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Oner wins: Longevity, Honours
w0nderful wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-wonderful-vs-oner-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Oner leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇦 w0nderful | 0 | 0 | 60 | 138 | 418 | 506 |
| 🇰🇷 Oner | 0 | 0 | 76 | 162 | 440 | 440 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | w0nderfulActive | OnerActive |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Big tournament titles | 6 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 2 | — |
| Tournament MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 5 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| World finals | — | 4 |
| LCK titles | — | 1 |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | — | 1 |
| Professional seasons | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Mun "Oner" Hyeon-jun leads with a GOAT score of 84.3 against 83.7 for Ihor "w0nderful" Zhdanov — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
w0nderful scores higher on statistics. Oner leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. w0nderful: 83.7, Oner: 84.3.
Make your case for w0nderful vs Oner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.