Who is better, YEKINDAR or gla1ve?
gla1ve leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks gla1ve above Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis: 86.6 vs 86.5. gla1ve leads on Honours. Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →gla1ve wins: Honours
YEKINDAR wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/es-yekindar-vs-gla1ve
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
gla1ve leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇻 YEKINDAR | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 268 | 717 |
| 🇩🇰 gla1ve | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 366 | 682 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | YEKINDARActive | gla1veRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 8 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 3 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Opening kills per round leader seasons | 2 | — |
| Majors won | — | 4 |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | — | 2 |
| Big event titles | — | 20 |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 3 |
| Major finals reached | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 82 |
gla1ve leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
YEKINDAR scores higher on statistics, longevity. gla1ve leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. YEKINDAR: 86.5, gla1ve: 86.6.
Make your case for YEKINDAR vs gla1ve. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.