Who is better, YEKINDAR or Keria?
Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.4 for Ryu "Keria" Min-seok — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis above Ryu "Keria" Min-seok: 86.5 vs 86.4. Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis leads on Longevity, Statistics. Ryu "Keria" Min-seok leads on Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →YEKINDAR wins: Longevity, Statistics
Keria wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-yekindar-vs-keria-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
YEKINDAR leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇻 YEKINDAR | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 268 | 717 |
| 🇰🇷 Keria | 0 | 0 | 74 | 158 | 428 | 612 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | YEKINDARActive | KeriaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Big tournament titles | 8 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 3 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Opening kills per round leader seasons | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| LCK titles | — | 2 |
| World finals | — | 4 |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | — | 1 |
| Professional seasons | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Mareks "YEKINDAR" Gaļinskis leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.4 for Ryu "Keria" Min-seok — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Keria scores higher on peak, honours. YEKINDAR leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. YEKINDAR: 86.5, Keria: 86.4.
Make your case for YEKINDAR vs Keria. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.