GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

zai vs PraY

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
PraYWinner
87.8

PraY wins: Dominance, Honours

zai
87.7

zai wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Esports

Shareable URL · /compare/es-zai-vs-es-pray

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Kim "PraY" Jong-in
87.8

PraY leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Two-time LCK champion and a World Championship finalist with ROX and KT.

1. Kim "PraY" Jong-in
87.8
2. Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg
87.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Trophies per season

Career timeline · Trophies per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through split year 5 · Trophies per season
1. 🇰🇷 Kim "PraY" Jong-in5 split years played · career day 1,826378 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg5 split years played · career day 1,825326 trophies
-13.8% vs PraY at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇸🇪 zai0050108326690
🇰🇷 PraY0055120282564

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetriczaiActivePraYRetired
Major titles5
The International top-four finishes3
Seasons played128
Career prize money in millions3
The International appearances8
LCK titles2
World Championship finals1
World Championship appearances5
Career kills3,000
Dominance w25%8486
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%8884
Honours w20%8688
Statistics w15%9090

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
PraY87.8
zai87.7
The people
zai
PraY

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for zai vs PraY. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →