Who is better, zai or MinD_ContRoL?
Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.6 for MinD_ContRoL — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg above MinD_ContRoL: 87.7 vs 87.6. Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg leads on Longevity, Statistics. MinD_ContRoL leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →zai wins: Longevity, Statistics
MinD_ContRoL wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/es-zai-vs-mind-control-d2
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
zai leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 zai | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 690 |
| 🇧🇬 MinD_ContRoL | 0 | 0 | 58 | 125 | 383 | 726 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | zaiActive | MinD_ContRoLActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 5 | 4 |
| The International top-four finishes | 3 | — |
| Seasons played | 12 | — |
| Career prize money in millions | 3 | — |
| The International appearances | 8 | — |
| The International titles | — | 1 |
| The International finals | — | 2 |
| TI appearances | — | 7 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Ludwig "zai" Wåhlberg leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.6 for MinD_ContRoL — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
MinD_ContRoL scores higher on dominance, honours. zai leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. zai: 87.7, MinD_ContRoL: 87.6.
Make your case for zai vs MinD_ContRoL. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.