Who is better, EternalEnvy or Nuguri?
Jang "Nuguri" Ha-gwon leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.7 for EternalEnvy — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jang "Nuguri" Ha-gwon above EternalEnvy: 81.0 vs 80.7. Jang "Nuguri" Ha-gwon leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance. EternalEnvy leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nuguri wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
EternalEnvy wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/eternalenvy-d2-vs-nuguri-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nuguri leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 EternalEnvy | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 259 | 636 |
| 🇰🇷 Nuguri | 0 | 0 | 70 | 154 | 406 | 470 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EternalEnvyRetired | NuguriRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Premier tournament wins | 4 | — |
| TI appearances | 8 | — |
| TI top-eight finishes | 2 | — |
| Career seasons | 11 | — |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| LCK titles | — | 2 |
| LPL finals | — | 1 |
| World finals | — | 1 |
| Professional seasons | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 85 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Jang "Nuguri" Ha-gwon leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.7 for EternalEnvy — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
EternalEnvy scores higher on longevity. Nuguri leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. EternalEnvy: 80.7, Nuguri: 81.0.
Make your case for EternalEnvy vs Nuguri. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.