Who is better, Criqui or Inoue?
Eugène Criqui leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.3 for Naoya Inoue — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Criqui vs Inoue
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Eugène Criqui above Naoya Inoue: 86.4 vs 86.3. Eugène Criqui leads on Longevity. Naoya Inoue leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CriquiWinner
86.4Criqui wins: Longevity
Inoue
86.3Inoue wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/eugene-criqui-vs-naoya-inoue
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇫🇷 Eugène Criqui
86.4
Criqui leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Eugène Criqui
2. Naoya Inoue
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇫🇷 Eugène Criqui5 years played · career day 1,825268 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Naoya Inoue5 years played · career day 1,82615 title wins
-94.4% vs Criqui at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Criqui | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 268 | 559 |
| 🇯🇵 Inoue | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 24 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Criqui86.4
Inoue86.3
FAQ
Where does Inoue beat Criqui?
Inoue scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Criqui leads on longevity.
How is the Criqui vs Inoue score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Criqui: 86.4, Inoue: 86.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Criqui vs Inoue. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.