Who is better, Holyfield or Carpentier?
Georges Carpentier leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.6 for Evander Holyfield — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Georges Carpentier above Evander Holyfield: 87.7 vs 87.6. Georges Carpentier leads on Peak, Statistics. Evander Holyfield leads on Dominance, Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Carpentier wins: Peak, Statistics
Holyfield wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/evander-holyfield-vs-georges-carpentier
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Carpentier leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Holyfield | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 24 |
| 🇫🇷 Carpentier | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 211 | 592 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HolyfieldRetired | CarpentierRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 6 | 1 |
| Undisputed reigns | 2 | — |
| Career wins | 44 | 88 |
| Knockouts | 29 | 56 |
| Heavyweight title reigns | 4 | — |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | 3 | — |
| European titles | — | 4 |
| Weight classes contested | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Georges Carpentier leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.6 for Evander Holyfield — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Holyfield scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Carpentier leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Holyfield: 87.6, Carpentier: 87.7.
Make your case for Holyfield vs Carpentier. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.