Who is better, Holyfield or Fujioka?
Evander Holyfield leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Naoko Fujioka — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Evander Holyfield and Naoko Fujioka level at 87.6. Evander Holyfield leads on Dominance, Longevity, Honours. Naoko Fujioka leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Holyfield wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Fujioka wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/evander-holyfield-vs-naoko-fujioka
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Holyfield leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Holyfield | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 24 |
| 🇯🇵 Fujioka | 0 | 0 | 60 | 128 | 372 | 732 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HolyfieldRetired | FujiokaActive |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 6 | — |
| Undisputed reigns | 2 | — |
| Career wins | 44 | — |
| Knockouts | 29 | — |
| Heavyweight title reigns | 4 | — |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | 3 | — |
| Weight divisions held titles in | — | 5 |
| World titles won | — | 5 |
| Professional wins | — | 20 |
| Title fights | — | 18 |
| Professional years | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 92 |
Evander Holyfield leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Naoko Fujioka — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fujioka scores higher on peak, statistics. Holyfield leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Holyfield: 87.6, Fujioka: 87.6.
Make your case for Holyfield vs Fujioka. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.