Who is better, Ashford or Korzeniowski?
Robert Korzeniowski leads with a GOAT score of 89.7 against 89.5 for Evelyn Ashford — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Robert Korzeniowski above Evelyn Ashford: 89.7 vs 89.5. Robert Korzeniowski leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Evelyn Ashford leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Korzeniowski wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Ashford wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/evelyn-ashford-vs-robert-korzeniowski
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Korzeniowski leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Ashford | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 16 |
| 🇵🇱 Korzeniowski | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AshfordRetired | KorzeniowskiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | 5 | — |
| World records | 2 | — |
| 100 m personal best | 10.76 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 5 | 4 |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| World Championship golds | — | 3 |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| 50km best (min) | — | 220.71 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Robert Korzeniowski leads with a GOAT score of 89.7 against 89.5 for Evelyn Ashford — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ashford scores higher on statistics, longevity. Korzeniowski leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ashford: 89.5, Korzeniowski: 89.7.
Make your case for Ashford vs Korzeniowski. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.