Who is better, Artamonova or De Gennaro?
Evgeniya Artamonova leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 87.8 for Monica De Gennaro — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Evgeniya Artamonova above Monica De Gennaro: 88.0 vs 87.8. Evgeniya Artamonova leads on Longevity. Monica De Gennaro leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Artamonova wins: Longevity
De Gennaro wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/evgeniya-artamonova-vs-monica-de-gennaro
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Artamonova leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Artamonova | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 352 | 724 |
| 🇮🇹 De Gennaro | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ArtamonovaRetired | De GennaroActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| European titles | 4 | — |
| Grand Prix titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 5 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Champions League titles | — | 5 |
| Best libero awards | — | 8 |
| Italian league titles | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteEvgeniya Artamonova leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 87.8 for Monica De Gennaro — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
De Gennaro scores higher on statistics. Artamonova leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Artamonova: 88.0, De Gennaro: 87.8.
Make your case for Artamonova vs De Gennaro. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.