Who is better, Artamonova or Rogers?
Evgeniya Artamonova leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 87.9 for Todd Rogers — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Evgeniya Artamonova above Todd Rogers: 88.0 vs 87.9. Evgeniya Artamonova leads on Longevity, Honours. Todd Rogers leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Artamonova wins: Longevity, Honours
Rogers wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/evgeniya-artamonova-vs-todd-rogers
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Artamonova leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Artamonova | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 352 | 724 |
| 🇺🇸 Rogers | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 23 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ArtamonovaRetired | RogersRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 2 | 1 |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| European titles | 4 | — |
| Grand Prix titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 5 | 3 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Tour titles | — | 22 |
| AVP titles | — | 46 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Evgeniya Artamonova leads with a GOAT score of 88.0 against 87.9 for Todd Rogers — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rogers scores higher on dominance, statistics. Artamonova leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Artamonova: 88.0, Rogers: 87.9.
Make your case for Artamonova vs Rogers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.