Who is better, Goolagong or Schroeder?
Evonne Goolagong Cawley leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Ted Schroeder — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Goolagong vs Schroeder
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Evonne Goolagong Cawley and Ted Schroeder level at 83.1. Evonne Goolagong Cawley leads on Longevity. Ted Schroeder leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GoolagongWinner
83.1Goolagong wins: Longevity
Schroeder
83.1Schroeder wins: Peak
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/evonne-goolagong-vs-ted-schroeder
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Evonne Goolagong Cawley
83.1
Goolagong leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Evonne Goolagong Cawley
2. Ted Schroeder
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Ted Schroeder5 seasons played · career day 1,825252 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Evonne Goolagong Cawley5 seasons played · career day 2,55642 titles
-83.3% vs Schroeder at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Goolagong | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 58 |
| 🇺🇸 Schroeder | 0 | 0 | 35 | 78 | 252 | 590 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GoolagongRetired | SchroederRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 7 | — |
| Australian Open titles | 4 | — |
| Career titles | 86 | — |
| Grand Slam finals | 18 | — |
| Fed Cups | 3 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | 2 | 1 |
| Major singles titles | — | 2 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 5 |
| US Championships | — | 1 |
| Davis Cup singles wins | — | 13 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Goolagong83.1
Schroeder83.1
FAQ
Where does Schroeder beat Goolagong?
Schroeder scores higher on peak. Goolagong leads on longevity.
How is the Goolagong vs Schroeder score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Goolagong: 83.1, Schroeder: 83.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Goolagong vs Schroeder. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.