Who is better, f0rest or GeT_RiGhT?
Patrik "f0rest" Lindberg leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.0 for Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Patrik "f0rest" Lindberg above Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund: 77.3 vs 77.0. Patrik "f0rest" Lindberg leads on Longevity. Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →f0rest wins: Longevity
GeT_RiGhT wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/f0rest-vs-getright
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
f0rest leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 f0rest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.16 |
| 🇸🇪 GeT_RiGhT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.54 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | f0restRetired | GeT_RiGhTRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | 1 |
| Top-20 appearances | 8 | 7 |
| Premier tournament wins | 35 | 30 |
| 1.6 world titles | 3 | — |
| Years at tier-1 level | 18 | — |
| Career prize money (USD) | 650,000 | 700,000 |
| HLTV Player of the Year | — | 2 |
| LAN win streak | — | 87 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 76 |
Patrik "f0rest" Lindberg leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.0 for Christopher "GeT_RiGhT" Alesund — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
GeT_RiGhT scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. f0rest leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. f0rest: 77.3, GeT_RiGhT: 77.0.
Make your case for f0rest vs GeT_RiGhT. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.