Who is better, f0rest or Kramer?
Patrik "f0rest" Lindberg leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.3 for Kramer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Patrik "f0rest" Lindberg and Kramer level at 77.3. Patrik "f0rest" Lindberg leads on Longevity. Kramer leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →f0rest wins: Longevity
Kramer wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/f0rest-vs-kramer-lol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
f0rest leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 f0rest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.16 |
| 🇰🇷 Kramer | 0 | 0 | 48 | 102 | 302 | 584 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | f0restRetired | KramerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| Top-20 appearances | 8 | — |
| Premier tournament wins | 35 | — |
| 1.6 world titles | 3 | — |
| Years at tier-1 level | 18 | — |
| Career prize money (USD) | 650,000 | — |
| Worlds appearances | — | 2 |
| LPL playoff runs | — | 4 |
| LCK seasons | — | 4 |
| Career seasons | — | 9 |
| Career playoff series | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 78 |
Patrik "f0rest" Lindberg leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.3 for Kramer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kramer scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. f0rest leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. f0rest: 77.3, Kramer: 77.3.
Make your case for f0rest vs Kramer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.