Who is better, Claudino or Krasilnikov?
Viacheslav Krasilnikov leads with a GOAT score of 88.4 against 88.3 for Fabiana Claudino — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Viacheslav Krasilnikov above Fabiana Claudino: 88.4 vs 88.3. Viacheslav Krasilnikov leads on Statistics, Peak. Fabiana Claudino leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Krasilnikov wins: Peak, Statistics
Claudino wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/fabiana-claudino-vs-viacheslav-krasilnikov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Krasilnikov leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Claudino | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 40 |
| 🇷🇺 Krasilnikov | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 326 | 680 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ClaudinoRetired | KrasilnikovActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| World Grand Prix titles | 8 | — |
| World Cup medals | 2 | — |
| Pan American golds | 2 | — |
| Club world titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World Tour titles | — | 12 |
| European medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Viacheslav Krasilnikov leads with a GOAT score of 88.4 against 88.3 for Fabiana Claudino — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Claudino scores higher on longevity. Krasilnikov leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Claudino: 88.3, Krasilnikov: 88.4.
Make your case for Claudino vs Krasilnikov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.