Who is better, Fabiana or Sánchez?
Fabiana da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 82.0 against 81.9 for Hugo Sánchez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Fabiana da Silva above Hugo Sánchez: 82.0 vs 81.9. Fabiana da Silva leads on Honours, Longevity. Hugo Sánchez leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fabiana wins: Longevity, Honours
Sánchez wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/fabiana-da-silva-v-vs-hugo-sanchez
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fabiana leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Fabiana | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 294 | 610 |
| 🇲🇽 Sánchez | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FabianaRetired | SánchezRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| World Cup appearances | 3 | — |
| Brazil caps | 100 | — |
| Copa América titles | 2 | — |
| League titles | 3 | — |
| Pichichi titles | — | 5 |
| La Liga titles | — | 5 |
| Career goals | — | 398 |
| La Liga goals | — | 234 |
| Mexico caps | — | 58 |
| UEFA Cups | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 85 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 88 |
Fabiana da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 82.0 against 81.9 for Hugo Sánchez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sánchez scores higher on peak, statistics. Fabiana leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fabiana: 82.0, Sánchez: 81.9.
Make your case for Fabiana vs Sánchez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.