Who is better, Fabinho or Materazzi?
Fabinho leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Marco Materazzi — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Fabinho vs Materazzi
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Fabinho and Marco Materazzi level at 85.5.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FabinhoWinner
85.5Fabinho wins: no category outright
Materazzi
85.5Materazzi wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/fabinho-v-vs-marco-materazzi-v
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇷 Fabinho
85.5
Fabinho leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Fabinho
2. Marco Materazzi
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇧🇷 Fabinho5 seasons played · career day 1,826311 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇹 Marco Materazzi5 seasons played · career day 1,825293 goals
-5.8% vs Fabinho at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Fabinho | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 238 | 653 |
| 🇮🇹 Materazzi | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 293 | 605 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Fabinho85.5
Materazzi85.5
FAQ
Where does Materazzi beat Fabinho?
Materazzi does not lead any of the five categories; Fabinho is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Fabinho vs Materazzi score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fabinho: 85.5, Materazzi: 85.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Fabinho vs Materazzi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.