Who is better, Fabinho or Gyökeres?
Fabinho leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Viktor Gyökeres — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Fabinho and Viktor Gyökeres level at 85.5. Fabinho leads on Longevity, Honours. Viktor Gyökeres leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fabinho wins: Longevity, Honours
Gyökeres wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/fabinho-v-vs-viktor-gyokeres-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fabinho leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Fabinho | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 238 | 653 |
| 🇸🇪 Gyökeres | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 235 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FabinhoActive | GyökeresActive · Arsenal |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 1 | — |
| Premier League titles | 1 | — |
| Club World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Brazil caps | 30 | — |
| Career appearances | 500 | — |
| European Golden Shoe awards | — | 1 |
| Primeira Liga titles | — | 2 |
| Portuguese league goals | — | 68 |
| Sweden goals | — | 20 |
| Career goals | — | 200 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 92 |
Fabinho leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Viktor Gyökeres — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gyökeres scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Fabinho leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fabinho: 85.5, Gyökeres: 85.5.
Make your case for Fabinho vs Gyökeres. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.