Who is better, Conte or Tetyukhin?
Facundo Conte leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.7 for Sergey Tetyukhin — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Facundo Conte above Sergey Tetyukhin: 79.0 vs 78.7. Facundo Conte leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Sergey Tetyukhin leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Conte wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Tetyukhin wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/facundo-conte-vs-tetyukhin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Conte leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Conte | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 258 | 694 |
| 🇷🇺 Tetyukhin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 28 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ConteActive | TetyukhinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 4 |
| South American titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Brazilian league titles | 2 | — |
| Years with the national team | 15 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| European Championship titles | — | 2 |
| World League titles | — | 3 |
| Russian league titles | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 74 |
Facundo Conte leads with a GOAT score of 79.0 against 78.7 for Sergey Tetyukhin — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Tetyukhin scores higher on longevity. Conte leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Conte: 79.0, Tetyukhin: 78.7.
Make your case for Conte vs Tetyukhin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.