Who is better, Kipyegon or Korzeniowski?
Robert Korzeniowski leads with a GOAT score of 89.7 against 89.5 for Faith Kipyegon — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Robert Korzeniowski above Faith Kipyegon: 89.7 vs 89.5. Robert Korzeniowski leads on Longevity, Honours. Faith Kipyegon leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Korzeniowski wins: Longevity, Honours
Kipyegon wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/faith-kipyegon-vs-robert-korzeniowski
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Korzeniowski leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇪 Kipyegon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 239 | 1,179.59 |
| 🇵🇱 Korzeniowski | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KipyegonActive | KorzeniowskiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | 4 |
| World Championship golds | 3 | 3 |
| World records | 3 | — |
| 1500 m world record (s) | 209.63 | — |
| Mile world record (s) | 246.95 | — |
| Diamond League titles | 5 | — |
| European titles | — | 2 |
| 50km best (min) | — | 220.71 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteRobert Korzeniowski leads with a GOAT score of 89.7 against 89.5 for Faith Kipyegon — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kipyegon scores higher on statistics. Korzeniowski leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kipyegon: 89.5, Korzeniowski: 89.7.
Make your case for Kipyegon vs Korzeniowski. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.