Who is better, Faker or olofmeister?
Lee "Faker" Sang-hyeok leads with a GOAT score of 97.5 against 74.2 for Olof "olofmeister" Kajbjer — a gap of 23.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lee "Faker" Sang-hyeok above Olof "olofmeister" Kajbjer: 97.5 vs 74.2. Lee "Faker" Sang-hyeok leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Faker wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
olofmeister wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/faker-vs-olofmeister
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Faker leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for olofmeister — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | FakerActive · T1 (SK Telecom T1) | olofmeisterRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championships | 5 | — |
| MSI titles | 2 | — |
| Domestic league titles | 10 | — |
| Career KDA | 5.1 | — |
| Pro seasons | 12 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 1.6 | — |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| Top-20 appearances | — | 5 |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 20 |
| HLTV No. 2 finishes | — | 1 |
| Major MVPs | — | 1 |
| Career prize money (USD) | — | 1,100,000 |
| Dominance w25% | 98 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 97 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 99 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 93 | 74 |
Lee "Faker" Sang-hyeok leads with a GOAT score of 97.5 against 74.2 for Olof "olofmeister" Kajbjer — a gap of 23.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
olofmeister does not lead any of the five categories; Faker is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Faker: 97.5, olofmeister: 74.2.
Make your case for Faker vs olofmeister. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.