GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Fang vs Barnes

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FangWinner
76.6

Fang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Barnes
76.5

Barnes wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/fang-bo-vs-chester-barnes-tt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Fang Bo
76.6

Fang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World Championship singles finalist in 2015 and a world team champion.

1. Fang Bo
76.6
2. Chester Barnes
76.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Fang Bo5 seasons played · career day 1,825384 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Chester Barnes5 seasons played · career day 1,825297 titles
-22.7% vs Fang at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Fang0060130384674
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Barnes004699297619

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricFangRetiredBarnesRetired
World Championship team golds2
World Championship singles finals1
World Tour titles4
Best world ranking4
Asian Championship medals3
English titles5
European Championship appearances5
World Championship appearances6
English Open titles2
International caps100
Dominance w25%7472
Peak w20%8682
Longevity w20%7078
Honours w20%7674
Statistics w15%7878

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Fang76.6
Barnes76.5
The people
Fang
Barnes

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Fang vs Barnes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →