Who is better, Federer or Navratilova?
Martina Navratilova leads with a GOAT score of 95.1 against 94.0 for Roger Federer — a gap of 1.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Martina Navratilova above Roger Federer: 95.1 vs 94.0. Martina Navratilova leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity. Roger Federer leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Navratilova wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Federer wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/federer-vs-martina-navratilova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Navratilova leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
Navratilova is -100.0% behind Federer's pace at age 21
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | FedererRetired | NavratilovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 20 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 310 | 332 |
| Masters 1000 titles | 28 | — |
| Career titles | 103 | — |
| Match win % | 82% | 90.1% |
| Year-end No. 1 finishes | 5 | — |
| Olympic gold | 0 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 18 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 31 |
| Career singles titles | — | 167 |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 93 | 95 |
| Peak w20% | 97 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 95 | 97 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 93 | 93 |
Martina Navratilova leads with a GOAT score of 95.1 against 94.0 for Roger Federer — a gap of 1.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Federer scores higher on peak. Navratilova leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Federer: 94.0, Navratilova: 95.1.
Make your case for Federer vs Navratilova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.